There has been much on MLN (Mainstream Lamestream News) about how the cruel and unusual Ohio State government forced a 10-year old rape victim to go to the state of Indiana in order to get her abortion. The extreme leftist pro-abortionists are using this unfortunate situation to promote their extremism and condemn the Supreme Court’s decision to turn the issue back to the states where is rightfully belongs. The do not trust the states to govern themselves as was pointed out in the State Rights – A Resurrection, Insurrection, and The Duality of Hypocrisy blog on the day we celebrate Independence Day.
While MLN and the president have jumped the gun on exploiting this horrific tragedy, the real truth is beginning and continues to come out, which should put the prickly pickles back into their egotistical jars.
Biden, along with many others, were quick to jump the gun (rights for a little bit) and use this young girl’s most unfortunate circumstance to more victimization. They used it to promote the most extreme positions of what has for almost the last 50 years become legislation from the bench. It has been a liberal court during the whole time since Roe vs Wade and expanding abortion rights up to the moment of birth for any reason, from which scientific research and Big Pharma have greatly benefited.
Hey Joe, look what’s happened by that pen in your hand!
For more info on Gerson Fuentes the rapist go to: https://www.bing.com/search?q=The+Columbus+Dispatch+first+reported+that+Gerson+Fuentes+&form=ANNNB1&refig=0cc0078fb3a74ca7a7377ccddc15a37a&ntref=1
Is ABC beginning to cut come of the lame from their stream?
From the article:
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WTVG) – The Ohio Attorney General’s Office is clarifying what exemptions exist in Ohio’s newly-implemented abortion ban.
An explainer issued by Ohio AG Dave Yost’s office Thursday said there are three exemptions to the state’s heartbeat law that bans abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected, approximately six weeks into a pregnancy and before many women know they are pregnant.
Yost says there are three exemptions to the abortion ban:
- Cases of ectopic pregnancy
- Cases that would cause death of the mother
- Cases that cause a serious risk of substantial, irreversible impairment to a major bodily function of the mother
The explanation goes on to clarify that whether the exemptions apply to a given case depends on the facts of that case.
What is that third exemption in bold?
From the article: “No 10-year-old anywhere in the world should be having a baby,” Lewis Wall, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, told LiveScience.
Read the article above in full!
This is real science and women’s health.
Everything was being handled properly even though there was some misunderstanding about the new law in Ohio; however, laws should be written more clearly and maybe a little more time allowed to disseminate the information throughout the system. Everybody’s jumping the gun!
Even a rape victim over 18 still has the right to abort the product of the rape before a heartbeat is detectable under Ohio’s new law. So do those who want to have their sex and kill their babies too. It just has to be done before there is a detectable heartbeat, plenty of time for a woman to know why she is a week late for her monthly period.
[Men don’t have periods! PERIOD!]
The rape and/or incest of a 10-year old who is ovulating can cause a pregnancy which is medically a “serious risk of substantial, irreversible impairment to a major bodily function of the mother”. (Future child bearing capabilities.)
Flowers should not be plucked until they have fully bloomed, hopefully by a loving flower picker and for keeps.
From the article: If I’m being honest, there are those who say they are pro-life but struggle to answer the question, “But what about abortion in the case of rape or incest?” In fact, a 2011 Gallup poll showed that 59 percent of pro-lifers supported fetal termination when the pregnancy was the result of rape or incest.
One must ask this question: If a young girl who is raped is going through the change of life, but not yet reached maturity and a pregnancy puts the life of both the mother and infant at a very high risk, should both be condemned to death? It’s a little more complex than cutting a child in half to discover who the real mother is.
The age of consent (marriage) in most states is 18 or 16 with the permission of the parents. The laws are most likely biblically based.
Regardless of whatever an individual’s position is on the right to life and/or abortion rights issues are; “Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.” (Matt. 7:1-2)
Oh yea, all yawl liberal journalists, here’s some advice: Research the facts before you write! I’m sure there is more to come on this matter. Sadly, it’s will be after the fact of what has been already done. It is my opinion that this devastated young girl has been politically raped by many.