The white horse has a rather persistent rider. Although there are many reasons, many scientists and doctors are recommending not to give the vax to children…
BUT…
CDC Adds COVID-19 Vaccines to Child Immunization Schedule
From the article:
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) added COVID-19 vaccines to its routine immunization schedule for children and adults on Thursday, attracting criticism for the decision.
According to the CDC’s 2023 immunization schedule for children and adolescents, two or three doses of COVID-19 vaccines have been recommended beginning with infants who are just six months old. Children in the age group of 6 months to four years, and five years to 11 years are recommended COVID-19 vaccines from Moderna or Pfizer. Among children aged 12 to 18, Novavax vaccines are also recommended in addition to Pfizer and Moderna.
In the list for adults, two or three doses of COVID-19 vaccines have been recommended from the age of 19 years. The 2023 COVID-19 vaccine recommendation for kids and adults is included among other typically-recommended vaccines for measles, flu, rubella, and so on.
Advisers to the CDC in 2022 recommended adding the vaccines to the schedule.
Though the CDC has added COVID-19 vaccines to the recommended list, it has not mandated the vaccines. The agency does not have the authorization to do so, but local and state jurisdictions can, and many mandate most of the vaccines on the schedule. However, there are hardly any states that make flu vaccinations mandatory in public schools.
Lawyers have said they’ll sue any state that requires COVID-19 vaccination to attend school and many officials have vowed not to implement such a requirement.
The CDC’s move to add COVID-19 vaccines to immunization schedules has attracted criticism online….
****
Check your local jurisdictions!
Meanwhile, boosting right along…
Booster Shots May Trigger Stroke Incidents, According to CDC and FDA
From the article:
In addition to cardiac events, another life-threatening side effect has been associated with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. When is the risk period? Does the flu shot play any role in these events? What actions should we take to better protect ourselves?
Summary of Key Facts
- An increased risk of stroke events has been identified with the Pfizer COVID-19 bivalent vaccine, according to a joint statement from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
- The onset time in people aged 65 years and older was 1–21 days after the booster, with a significant cluster of events observed 11–21 days after the booster.
- Sixty-four percent had received the flu vaccine on the same day as the COVID-19 booster.
- The bivalent booster contains the code of the spike protein, contributing to the increased risk of blood clots. High-risk people should avoid the boosters.
- Solution: Remember the five “suddens” of stroke warning signs.
- Advice on preventing other risk factors of stroke is also provided in this paper.
On Jan. 13, 2023, the FDA and CDC issued a joint statement that a new “safety signal” for ischemic stroke had been detected in one of the agency’s vaccine safety surveillance systems.
The statement read, in part: “CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), a near real-time surveillance system, met the statistical criteria to prompt additional investigation into whether there was a safety concern for ischemic stroke in people ages 65 and older who received the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine bivalent.”>>>
****
Solution?
Just say no thanks to the vax!
But some parents may disagree…
State Supreme Court Blocks Mother From Vaccinating Children Against COVID-19
From the article:
The Rhode Island Supreme Court has temporarily blocked a mother from getting her children vaccinated against COVID-19.
A trial court in January rejected arguments from Joshua Nagel, the children’s father, and said Lauren Nagel, the mother, could take her children to get COVID-19 vaccines. Lawyers for Joshua Nagel quickly asked the state’s top court for a stay.
A single justice entered a temporary stay on Jan. 26. The full court reviewed the case and on Feb. 9 said it was keeping the stay in place. Justices ordered Joshua Nagel to perfect an appeal within 15 days and for the parties to appear in court for oral arguments on April 13.
“We are just very gratified that the RI Supreme Court has granted this stay and is willing to listen to our arguments as to why these two young girls do not need the COVID vaccine,” Gregory Piccirilli, a lawyer representing Joshua Nagel, told The Epoch Times via email.
A lawyer representing Lauren Nagel did not respond to requests for comment.
The case is believed to be the first in the country dealing with a parental dispute over COVID-19 vaccines to make it to a state supreme court….
****
Hope it doesn’t lead to a divorce!?!?
And in the NFL…
From the article:
…But he was interviewed by Michael Strahan, and the video is here:
NEW — Damar Hamlin is Asked What Reason Doctors Gave Him For His Heart Stopping
“Umm, that’s something I want to stay away from” pic.twitter.com/pVUytXblOH
— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) February 14, 2023…
****
Umm’s the word!
Then two days later…
NFL Players Association Urged to Screen for Heart Issues Over Vaccine Side Effects
From the article:
The NFL Players Association (NFLPA) is being urged to offer players cardiac screening in light of the growing concern over COVID-19 vaccines causing heart inflammation.
The Health Freedom Defense Fund urged the association in a recent letter to implement screening because the vaccines can cause myocarditis, a form of heart inflammation. Young males are the most at risk.
Most NFL players received a COVID-19 vaccine under pressure from teams and the league….
****
What will they find?
&
Speaking of finding…
How about love among unvaxed singles??
‘World’s First’ Unvaccinated Dating Service Launches in Hawaii
From the article:
Nowadays, online dating seems less a game of hit or miss than medical truth or dare, given the deal-breaker question, “Are you vaccinated?”
Businesswomen Shelby Thomson and Heather Pyle of Maui, Hawaii, found the online dating game a frustrating experience for the un-jabbed at the height of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout in 2021.
Faced with discrimination and censorship, many unvaccinated people lost jobs and relationships because they chose to remain unvaccinated. The un-jabbed “didn’t have the option to say they were unvaccinated” to potential online dating partners, Thomson said.
“They were only allowed to be vaccinated. And you had to have this badge in your [online] profile.”
Too often, the unvaccinated would hear on dating sites, “Swipe left”—move on.
In May 2021, the two business partners, moms, and best friends launched “Unjected,” a dating app for the unvaccinated, on the Google and Apple stores.
“We started seeing people wanting to find partners,” Thomson said of their unvaccinated friends.
However, soon after the app’s launch, Thomson and Pyle started receiving hate emails, then negative publicity in the media. Apple decided to remove “Unjected” from the app store, claiming it provided medical disinformation.
“We tailored everything and played this chess game until it [met] Apple standards,” Thomson recalled. But it still wasn’t enough.
“It took us until July 31 to get banned.”
When Google threatened to follow suit, Thomson and Pyle pulled the plug on both media giants, and Unjected.com went live using the web domain host GoDaddy in August 2021.
“We decided—OK—the big-tech world is not our friend. They don’t want us to exist in this realm. They’ll always go out of their way to ensure we’re censored or taken down.”
Thomson said “Unjected” is more than a dating service for the unvaccinated. It’s also a blood bank database and a fertility bank for the unvaccinated….
****
HI! I’m unvaxed! I like…
…And I hate delays!
FDA Reveals Why It Changed End Date of Study of Heart Inflammation After COVID Vaccination
From the article:
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) changed the end date of a study it is requiring Pfizer to conduct because Pfizer requested a delay, the agency says.
“The company requested an extension from FDA for completion, which the agency granted,” an FDA spokesperson told The Epoch Times via email.
When the FDA approved Pfizer’s vaccine in August 2021, it said Pfizer was required to conduct postmarketing studies to evaluate the safety of the vaccine.
One of the studies was meant to assess post-vaccination subclinical myocarditis, or heart inflammation, following a third dose of the vaccine in people aged 16 to 30.
That study was going to be completed on June 30, 2022, with Pfizer submitting a final report on the results to the FDA by Dec. 31, 2022.
After the deadline passed, the FDA quietly changed the end date to June 30, 2023….
****
FDA say’s MUM,s the word!?!?
While…
The Federal Government Is Tracking the Unvaccinated
From the article:
The U.S. government has been secretly tracking those who didn’t get the COVID jab, as well as those who aren’t up to date on their shots. Worse, it is recording the reason why. Now that the program has been widely adopted, know why it’s being done and how you can outsmart it….
…Call to Action
Knowing all of this, what can you do about it? How do we stop this madness? Here are a few suggestions:
- Demand Congress finish what the Senate started by declaring the public health emergency over and done with. Jan. 17, 2023, HR 382, a bill “to terminate the public health emergency declared with respect to COVID-19” was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. This bill must be passed.
- Contact your Congressional representative and let them know you:
- Support the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government’s investigation.
- Want Congress to reject all attempts by the administrative state, the United Nations, the WHO, Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Biden Administration to require a vaccine passport or a digital ID.
- Expect them to work to ensure the freedom of travel for all citizens.
- Expect them to protect Constitutional rights.
- Expect them to protect all rights to privacy, including and especially medical privacy, and since these new ICD-10 codes violate your right to privacy, you want them to take immediate action to ensure the codes are revoked.
Concerning what you can do to protect your medical privacy on a personal level, keep in mind that independent doctors are not required to use ICD codes unless they accept insurance. So by choosing a doctor who is in private practice, you can avoid getting tagged and trapped in the system….
****
And who can afford that?
In Uncle Sam we trust????
Then this…
Put on report for being AWOL after getting kicked out?!?!
And then there’s the…
Ever been “blacklisted”?
Getting a little bit off subject…
CRT will “whitelist” you if you’re white!
Now, back to the vax…
Myocarditis: Once Rare, Now Common
From the article:
As an actively practicing clinical cardiologist for many years in three different communities, I knew about myocarditis. I just never saw it. Quite literally, I recall seeing ONE young woman who presented with a picture of acute congestive heart failure, and her echocardiogram study revealed a big and poorly contracting heart. Such a condition is diagnosed as an idiopathic congestive cardiomyopathy, which basically means the heart is enlarged and functioning very poorly, and you have no idea why. After treating her with traditional measures for congestive heart failure, she started getting better. To my great surprise, after six to nine months of follow-up, her echocardiogram had returned to normal.
Retrospectively, it was then clear that she had likely contracted a virus that focused on her heart. The virus-induced inflammation in her heart muscle cells then decreased the strength of her heart contractions to the point of clinical heart failure with heart enlargement. Presumably, her young immune system eventually “kicked in” and eliminated the viral culprit. Even as a clinician who also received many patients in consultation from other doctors, she represented the entirety of my cases of myocarditis. And at that, the diagnosis was only a retrospective conclusion.
COVID and Myocarditis
Today, the active clinical cardiologist is seeing myocarditis patients on a regular basis. The scientific literature indicates that myocarditis is occurring quite frequently in patients harboring the chronic presence of the COVID-related spike protein. This is being seen in many individuals with persistent chronic COVID, many of whom have been vaccinated, as well as in a substantial number of individuals who have been vaccinated and have never contracted COVID [1–4]. A study in mice showed that the injection of the mRNA vaccine (which produces the spike protein) reliably induced myopericarditis [5]. Regardless of the initial source of exposure to spike protein, it appears to be the reason for the pathology and symptoms seen in chronic COVID [6].
While not yet clearly documented by any well-designed studies in the medical literature, a great deal of anecdotal information indicates that vaccine mRNA shedding can occur. And once transmitted, the mRNA directly leads to spike protein production [7]. Such mRNA shedding means that the spike protein is indirectly—if not directly, as well—transmissible from one individual to another via inhalation or various forms of skin contact. In fact, Pfizer’s own internal documents advise about the possibility of “environmental exposure” by “inhalation or skin contact” of the mRNA in the vaccine being transmitted from a vaccinated individual to another person [8]. Furthermore, while many try to dismiss such an “exposure” as too minimal to be of clinical consequence, such an assertion cannot be assumed to be true when dealing with an agent (spike protein) that appears capable of replication once it gains access to the body. The toxicity associated with spike protein would not be due to a one-time exposure, but one that could persist indefinitely because of this ability to replicate. A toxin that has such an ability is truly a clinical nightmare. It is never a good idea to overestimate the integrity of the pharmaceutical industry [9]….
****
How did it get so common so quick????
Warp speed!?!?
“…never a good idea to overestimate the integrity of the pharmaceutical industry…”!?!?
And now that covid money is run out…
Moderna Reverses Course, Says People Won’t Have to Pay for COVID-19 Vaccine
From the article:
Moderna has reversed course and promised that people will not have to pay for the company’s COVID-19 vaccine once the U.S. government stops buying shots.
“Moderna remains committed to ensuring that people in the United States will have access to our COVID-19 vaccines regardless of ability to pay,” the company said in a statement.
Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine “will continue to be available at no cost for insured people whether they receive them at their doctors’ offices or local pharmacies,” according to the company. People who don’t have health insurance, or don’t have adequate insurance, will be able to get the vaccine “at no cost” through a Moderna assistance program, it added.
The U.S. government has purchased hundreds of millions of COVID-19 vaccine doses since 2020 and Americans who want one have not been charged.
President Joe Biden’s administration plans to end the COVID-19 public health emergency in May and stop buying more vaccine doses.
While some already-purchased doses will be available for some time, the change could potentially lead to people paying to get vaccinated. The Department of Health and Human Services has said that “many Americans will continue to pay nothing out-of-pocket” to get a vaccine because most private insurers, and Medicare, would cover the vaccines at least through September 2024….
****
Then what?!?!
The great giveaway….
Courtesy of the WEF!?!?
Revelation 6:2
(KJV) And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer.
{See Missing Links – Appendis IV for definitions, or click embeds.}
Come out of Babylon for her judgement is near!
LOLGB+
The Ezekiel 33 Watchman Report 